By Sharon May
When I started my novel, I didn’t know the
story I wanted to tell. Was it the story of burying the bones or the story of
finding the bones? If it was the former,
was the setting 1942 or 1978? Or both? If it was of finding the bones, was it
the story of who buried the bones, or the story of the reporters who attempt to
uncover the truth about the bones? I decided I wanted to tell the story of what
happens in the lives of the characters once the bones are found. One narrator
could not tell that story. So I began writing with two narrators, Lafe and
Preston, two men who are as different as a Saint Bernard and a Chihuahua. I
chose first person because of its immediacy and intimacy, but also because both
narrators have secrets and live much of their lives alone.
At this point, I found it easy to meet
the first rule of multiple narrators: the reader must be able to open the text
at any place and immediately identify the narrator of that section. Narrators,
like all characters, must be different in language, tone, and cadence. They
must be true to themselves in what they say and how they say it.
I finished a draft with two narrators,
but was not satisfied. With the help of an editor experienced with Appalachian
literature, I realized two narrators told the story of the bones, but not the
story of life in Appalachia so I began adding narrators.
This decision complicated the writing. Obviously,
each narrator must sound different from the others. With two narrators, I could
alter chapters. Now I have to determine the order of the narrators’ chapters to
tell the story coherently and cohesively. There are lots of options of who
speaks next. I don’t want repeated events, unless different perspectives on the
events add to the readers’ understanding. Also, I have to decide who should
tell what. Sometimes, only one narrator knows of an event, and the choice is
logical. However, shared experiences creates choices, and it is difficult at
times to know which narrator is the right one for a scene.
Now I have no
idea how many narrators I will use to tell the story of small town life in
Appalachia in 1978, a time of change and of what some call progress. With
multiple narrators comes layers of complexity, conflict, and theme, I can’t
help to think my story will be like an Apple Stack Cake, which has many layers
(the thinner the better, the more the better), all separated by dried apples or
applesauce. As the cake ages, the taste of apples seeps into the layers, creating
one heavenly treat. A woman who makes this cake nowadays is a rare find. She,
like a lot of my culture, is dying, and I would like to preserve at least some
of my memories of that culture in a novel.
1 comment:
With multiple narrators I find that a linear time sequence becomes a challenge. The story jumps around -- two steps forward and one (or two) backward. This became so complicated in an antebellum story I wrote that I created three novels to tell the same story from various viewpoints. I constantly used notes on the date and time of events to be sure they happened in order for each of the narrators. Good luck!
Post a Comment