By Bonnie Stanard
As I’ve been reading the novel Empire Falls, I wonder how author Richard Russo keeps me hooked on
a story in which only ordinary characters go about their ordinary lives. Isn’t
that a formula for a ho-hum book? The plot revolves around the manager of a
diner in Empire Falls, an economically depressed town in Maine. You can read
pages in which hardly anything happens but that’s not to say it’s boring. To
the contrary, it’s engrossing. It reminds me of Jonathan Franzen’s Freedom, another novel that showplaces
the ordinary. In that case, I surprised myself by continuing to read it to the
end.
If you Google “plot” you’ll get lists of the many types (as
many as 36 listed by Jerry Flattum), but you won’t find a type such as
“ordinary-day” or “slice-of-life.” However, this plot was proved viable in 1922
when James Joyce wrote the classic Ulysses (which lives up to Mark Twain’s definition of a classic). Essentially,
Joyce wrote about an average day in the life of Leonard Bloom. How did Joyce
recount mundane events in a way that created a significant novel?
Most of us live ordinary lives, but at times, a person or
situation may affect us in such a way that we need to put our thoughts in
writing. It’s not unusual for workshop writers to bring fictionalized accounts
of events that impress them. I’ve written such stories myself, in an effort to
recapture something meaningful to me. Or to pass along to others something I
think is valuable. Even as I’ve read these stories in workshop, I’ve felt my
own excitement, only to hear “ho-hum” from others.
Once I responded to an agent’s criticism with “But that’s
the way it was.” My story was pure reality, delivered with my tears and
laughter. And I thought it was worth telling. However the agent answered with,
“Just because it’s true doesn’t make it interesting.” After reading manuscripts
for years in our workshop, I understand. In fact, I’ve appropriated her comment
in critiquing other writings.
A strong component of ordinary
is predictable. That is to say, our
everyday life, by its very nature, is predictable for the most part. And when
we are formulating a slice-of-life story, predictability is already there, a
toxic part of the plot. Even though Empire
Falls is ordinary, it’s not predictable. Russo has an eye for the elusive,
a way of seeing what the rest of us don’t.
I think another aspect of success with a slice-of-life plot
is the author’s ability to convince us that we care about what happens. The
writing of Jonathan Franzen is a good example. He is fascinated by his
subjects. There is a tone, an author’s voice, that is nagging us on. Between
the words, he’s telling us this is something we can’t miss. This is important.
Though Russo’s novel is short on plot,
it is strong on characters. However, the central figure, Miles Roby, doesn’t
provoke excitement in the usual sense, nor is he controversial. In fact, he’s a
really nice guy, adores his daughter, tolerates an abusive father, and hopes
for the best for his soon to be ex-wife. Now how does Russo make this
milquetoast an engaging protagonist?
1 comment:
I love Richard Russo. Franzen was okay with The Corrections. Another author who has mastered the slice of life by adding major twists to the plot it Tom Perrotta.
Post a Comment