By Bonnie Stanard
Lorrie Moore wrote an
engaging article about the True Detective
television series in the New York Review
of Books last year that put me to thinking.
I haven’t watched the
series but, according to Moore ,
the first and second seasons are poles apart. Moore says Woody Harrelson and Matthew
McConaughey, as law enforcement agents, squabble and drink and have each
other’s back to great appeal in season one.
Season two, with different
actors, flounders, the dialogue a major problem (lines sounded “as if they’d been
Google-translated from Farsi”). According to Moore , “comedy has to have its finger on the
pulse of irreverence, something season one understood.”
From Moore ’s article, I’ve assembled the following
suggestions. The Potent list is from season one and Drivel from season two,
though Moore ’s
wording has been altered.
1. expound like a CEO of a
nihilist fortune cookie company (ironic irreverence can hardly be overdone,
especially by a character perceived as protecting society or promoting social
order)
2. unhinge oracular
soliloquies (make soliloquies unpredictable and destabilizing)
3. speak several minds (life
is full of contradictions. give characters dialogue with cross purposes)
4. only amble if there’s
rich consequences (without a pay-off, wandering and/or “wondering” enters a
dead zone)
5. dredge up incarnations (bring
up bizarre, outlandish people or events)
6. amuse with faux
philosophy (promote unnatural theories or spiritual beliefs)
7. share a secret (bring in
subtext, say something that means something else)
Drivel Dialogue
1. go vague or trite (“how
are you?” is for the graveyard)
2. attempt to underscore
seriousness (hinting at seriousness is adequate)
3. skirt subjects such as
race (politically correct is boring)
4. dawdle nonstop about sex
(the more talk, the less sensual)
5. sympathize wearily with
the devil (sympathize enthusiastically if you must)
6. spout nonsense (you
might think your philosophy of life is important, but think again)
7. spiritualize random
sequences (if the dog barks three times, your dead sister is trying to talk to
you...this is high school stuff)
8. sentimentalize dribble
re children, the strength of women (you’re not writing a social tract)
9. summarize or rush to a
close (this is tempting when you’ve been at a project and are tired of
rewriting)
To sum up, Moore credits Director Nic Pizzolatto’s
scripts with knowing “when reality is interesting, when reality is irrelevant,
and when reality is no excuse.”
(From Lorrie Moore’s
article “Sympathy for the Devil,” New York Review of Books Sept. 24, 2015)
3 comments:
I know this chick. Lorrie Moore went to St. Lawrence University. Everybody there is white and half are rich. I was one of the scholarship kids.
Another thing to remember is -- don't write a lot of dialogue! There lines max per speech, and those lines are centered on the page.
I was a devotee of the first season of TRUE DETECTIVE and avidly looked forward to the second. I only got through three episodes of Number Two. It sucked and seemed to be a totally different series. I attribute the difference to plot and casting in addition to dialogue.
Writing good dialogue can make all the difference. Look at The Big Short -- an excellent film because of its dialogue and innovative scenes.
Post a Comment