By Kimberly Johnson
Truth be told, I have been looking for clever ways to add Adam Levine into my blog. I found it—an entry that shatters my outlook about music review writing. Maroon 5’s front man is my newest crush (Sorry, Blake). Adam is a girl’s daydream: he’s good-looking; he’s on a hit tv show The Voice; and he’s has a breathtaking set of pipes. The song Sugar is a never-ending vehicle of sensual swagger that drives any girl crazy.
Your sugar, Yes, please, Won't you come and put it down on meI'm right here, 'cause I need, Little love and little sympathyYeah you show me good loving, Make it alrightNeed a little sweetness in my life, Your sugar, Yes, please, Won't you come and put it down on me
I believed writing a music review was pretentious—listen to a song, tell the reader that it was good, bad or ugly and then collect a check. Not a bad gig if you could get it. Well I was wrong. Structure is the basis of a well-reviewed piece. The reviewer employs the universal writing standards, along with the inverted pyramid style —lead sentence, facts, supporting details and a conclusion. The reviewer refrains from using “I” phrases and fanboy worship. The reviewer is an adept researcher, politician and predictor of the next biggest hit. He investigates the artist’s success and failures on the Billboard charts. He has to listen to the good, the bad and the ugly and provide an opinion that doesn’t affront the record producers and industry bigwigs.
I believed writing a music review was pretentious. Now, I believe writing a music review is like