At workshop we critics often disagree
about what makes good/bad writing. Some of us defend poor grammar and
punctuation as creative license. “We aren’t writing themes for English 101.”
Others accept point of view (POV) discrepancies. “Best-selling writers do it.”
Illogical plots either engage or alienate us. Repetitious words either provide
emphasis or tedium. We divide on whether characters are developed or
half-baked.
Perhaps the most valid criticisms of
our work are those that point out amateurish writing. But what separates
amateurish from professional?
It would require a book to address
subjects such as coherence, clarity, dialogue, tone, etc. But we can touch on what makes us appear
amateurish. Let’s give this a mega/mini treatment.
MEGA—THE
BIG PICTURE
—Duplication of what has already been
published. Will savvy readers recognize your plot or characters from other
novels? We may be copying a story from a book we’ve read. Years ago, George
Harrison was sued and found guilty of subconscious plagiarism of an earlier tune. The point is, we may be unaware.
—Unnoted shifts in point of view (POV).
I’ve heard writers argue that POV is irrelevant. Might as well argue that plot
is irrelevant, or dialogue or setting.
—Untrustworthy fabrication. When you create a fictional world, it
has a “reality” that you created. To break with that reality, even in little
ways, is to lose faith with your “truth.”
—Lack of knowledge about language
usage. What makes people think skills acquired through instruction and practice
aren’t necessary for a person to become a writer? Unlike, say, a surgeon? Okay,
anybody can write a blog, you say. Yes, and if I can pull out a splinter, I can
remove an appendix.
MINI—THE
DETAILS
Let’s get to the mini with a list. You
may say generalities are useless when it comes to creativity, but they can
coach those of us learning the game. According to an issue of Writer’s Digest* that I found in my
office, if you open a story with one of the following, you’re an amateur:
action
that turns out to be a dream
an alarm
clock buzzing
a phone
ringing
little or
no dialogue for three pages
unattributed
dialogue
alternatives
for said
the
villain, if it’s a mystery
outlandish
names like Sky or Zebediah
Because we
get numerous suggestions in workshop about what to change, it’s up to us to
figure out which criticisms to accept and which to reject. As we participate in
critiques and hone our work, we’re becoming more skilled in recognizing
amateurish writing. In large measure, that skill comes from reading what others
write. And that’s why we often hear the advice from professionals to read,
read, read.
*
Writers Digest July/August 09